In the wake of the second oil crisis in the early 1980’s, most people, even those “in the know” figured that performance motoring was dead. To take the place of the muscle and pony cars that had scarcely more than a decade earlier ruled the roads, consumers were presented with a number of barely warmed-over derivatives of terribly lame and uninspiring cars.
Ford EXP. Citation X-11. The Omni-based Dodge Charger. This is what “high performance” meant in what one automotive magazine called “The Era of Lowered Expectations”. However, not all was lost. By the end of the decade great strides had been made in returning power to the motoring people. Mustang had its GT and 5.0 models. The fearsome Pontiac GTA and IROC Z Camaros were running loose. It seemed that maybe, just maybe, it wasn’t so bleak after all.
Somewhere in this slowly lifting, self-imposed “performance embargo” came a new Dodge performance car. It wasn’t like the tire-shredding Hemi ‘Cudas and Chargers of days gone by, but this new car offered a lot more than the terribly lame Omni-based Charger it replaced. It was actually the final evolution of that line. What better name for it then, than the storied name of the ultimate Charger of old; Daytona.
The 1988 Dodge Daytona was, in its highest trim level, a respectable performance car. It mounted the 2.2L Chrysler Turbo II engine in an aerodynamic body. It had a lot of the tricks of the day, including pop-up headlights and a hatchback roof. Not surprisingly, MPC was all over the new Daytona. I mean, they’d made a kit of every one of the other Omni-based abominations, so it only made sense that they’d make a kit of the Daytona, the swansong of the body style. Ironically, it was also a swansong for MPC; shortly after they made their 1988 car kits, they were done themselves.
This kit is the newer AMT “Muscle” version of the MPC Daytona. It is cast entirely in light grey, with some chrome parts for the engine and wheels, and clear red taillights. The first impression of the kit is a solid “meh”. There’s no pizazz to the box art, and the kit on it is not only uninspiringly, but also incorrectly built. The instructions are adequate, largely, but don’t help much when it comes to using the proper engine parts.
The engine is the kit’s biggest strength and largest weakness. There are actually several (3) engines in this box, but the instructions don’t tell you that. I found building the engine to be very confusing, and it was only through some internet searching and looking at the original sales literature that I was able to figure out exactly what engine the car had, as well as what trim level it was!
The kit has, as do all MPCs, some flash, but it cleans up nicely, and most of the parts actually fit very well together! The chassis is well detailed, and engine bay is one of the more detailed ones I’ve seen, period. You can tell that this was right near the end of the line for MPC; they finally had it right!
One big hassle was the spoiler. It had two very prominent sink marks at each “trunk split”, and these had to be filled and sanded. I had to glue the spoiler onto the body BEFORE painting, since I knew it would never stick after painting. The problem was it was so thin and flexible that it didn’t want to sit properly. I had to tack it down with glue as I went around the car; a bit at a time!
The only other problem was the bumpers. As I’ve found on most cars with integrated bumpers, the endcaps for front and back don’t fit on properly most of the time. Firstly, there’s almost never an adequate surface for gluing them on, meaning that they are prone to snapping off. Also, positive location is an issue. To fix this, I glue little pieces of sheet styrene to the insides of the fenders and use them for both gluing surface and location.
Like all MPCs, the best detailing on this kit is in the interior. No American manufacturer seems to put as much detail into their interiors as MPC. The bucket has great door detailing, nice carpeting detail (fake pile to make it really look like fabric) and extremely accurate dash. As always, building an MPC interior is a rewarding experience.
Daytonas didn’t come in a huge variety of colours, but one that sticks out is a metallic, electric blue. Interestingly, the sales literature also shows that there was a light blue leather interior available for the Daytonas. Yep… light blue leather. Well, that’s just too awesome to go with a “Daytona Blue” exterior, so I had to do it. I painted the interior with a mixed light blue made from Testors Model Master Acrylics. It was some Duck Egg Blue, Flat White and GM Engine Block Blue, plus Tamiya Flat Base to give it a reduced sheen and speed drying. To accentuate the carpet’s pile and cracks in the seats, I used chalk pastel. I ground up a darker blue colour and applied it to the seat cracks with a fine paintbrush. I then used a worn, stumpy brush and “ground” the pigment into the carpet. This added “shadow”, giving the seats depth and the carpet a more ‘carpety’ look.
For the exterior, I used a mixture of Future, MMA GM Engine Block Blue and Jacquard pigments to get a very vibrant metallic blue. This was airbrushed over the car once it has been primered in grey, and then in GM Engine Block Blue. Using the blue base coat made it so that the metallic blue covered much better, and gave it depth as well; it wasn’t thick enough to cover the grey on its own.
When all the paint dried, the car was given multiple coats of Future and let sit for a few weeks. It was then sanded down to 12,000 grit using Detail Master’s sanding cloths, and the whole thing was given a coat of Turtle Wax Ice Paste Wax, to give it a nice shine.
The windows went in very well, and were white glued in place. The biggest problem was getting the engine to fit in; it’s a tight fit, and there are a lot of hoses and ducts thanks to the turbocharger setup on this engine. However, when complete, the engine bay has a suitably ‘busy’ look, much more so than many other kits.
I stripped the chrome from the wheels and sprayed them with aluminum paint. The real wheels aren’t chromed, and it looked silly. I used Citadel Baddab Black wash to pick out the bolts and ‘holes’ at the wheels’ edges. This worked really well, and added a lot to the wheels. The final touch was to white-letter the tires. It’s rare these days to have a car with actual letters, and while I know that they weren’t really in vogue in the late ‘80s, I still thought it added some “beef” to the final product!
Because this is a kit from the 1980s, it also has a very cool optional piece: a car phone! In today’s world of Bluetooth and cellphones, having a home-style (albeit touch tone, not dial) phone bolted to the centre armrest seems absolutely ridiculous. However, in 1988, it was THE BOMB. I painted the phone in a sickly cream-white, which I remember as the colour of our home phone back in the day.
The 1988 Daytona is not a car you see around much anymore. For that reason alone, this kit excited me; they were everywhere at one point, but we seem to have forgotten them. As a kit, this is actually a pretty good one, and if you’re a car buff, it won’t provide any untoward challenges.
There are weaknesses in it, to be sure, but overall it builds up nicely and is a good representation of the state of motoring in the late 1980s. It’s not a great kit for a beginner, since it has so many engine pieces, but other than that, it shouldn’t prove to be too difficult. Thanks to the AMT reissue, there are now a lot of these things flying around, so finding one of the old MPCs is no longer required.
Sure, this car itself might not appeal to a lot of older modellers, but for those who grew up in the 1980’s (especially those who had a license or aspired to one) the Daytona was a pretty cool car. Also, if you think about it, this Daytona is a really good homage to the original. With an aero nose, big spoiler and pop-up headlights, the 1988 Daytona does actually carry the name forward with a certain logical evolution. This might be the kind of kit that’s perfect for a near-mid-life crisis/nostalgia build!
Cool or not, this model is well built. i attribute it to your attention to detail. “Also, positive location is an issue” seems to be the biggest bugbear on most usa kit makers.
Hey, Thanks for the article. What kind of primer (the brand) did you use? I read you primered it gray.
Thanks,. Johann. I used Walmart’s house brand, “Colorplace” for the grey primer. Since I made the Daytona, they’ve changed the house brand to “Paint It” (I think), but it’s basically the same, if not a bit better.
Super cheap and good paint. Can’t beat it!
With my parents saying “No” to a Mustang GT or Camaro in high school,I tooled around in an ’85 CS edition Turbo Z,was a fun car (was my 3rd car-I’d sold my 1st 1 to buy my 2nd,which I promptly wrecked 😮 😛 ). I’d go on to own 3 others,another ’85 Turbo Z (non-Shelby model),yet another ’85,a non-turbo/non Z car,and an 88 base/non-turbo….Yeah,I liked em,LOL,but mostly they were cheap to buy,easy to work on,and (the turbo versions) could be made surprisingly quick with just a few tweaks to it’s induction and exhaust system.
I built an MPC ’85 or ’86 Turbo Z snap kit a couple years ago that semi-replicated the last one I owned (the ’85 non-turbo,a standard 2.2L/5 speed car)…but it wasn’t my best work. Still,was a fun build 🙂
Kevin is right,yours look svery well built. Nicely done 😀
Man, that’s a lot of those cars to own! I remember when there were around I always thought they were cool; like mini-Knight Rider car, almost!
The important part, for me, is always to have a fun build. Every model’s going to have flaws, and the builder will see them all! That’s why I love to build “loser” cars and Street Vans. I grew up surrounded by the “everyday loser” ones, and remember being awed by the vans and always wanting one!
Yep,it was a few I owned,LOL 😛 I always dug the vans too. My dad had a ’79 4×4 E250 that I always tried to sneak out in when going on a date in high school,heeheehee 😛 XD
I’ve onwed in the neighborhood of 250 cars/trucks in my 42 years of life so far (not all of them were nice/in the greatest of condition,LOL),including several Mustangs (including a ’94 GT ragtop that I bought new while in the Army,kept it for nearly 18 years),a few Camaros,Datsun/Nissan Z’z,several air cooled VW’s,(an ’88 Trans Am that looked the part of a GTA,but was just a 305 TPI/auto powered TA)…I’m really diggin’ checking these builds out. You do great work,lots of attention to detail 🙂
(BTW you’re very welcome,my friend)
As you alluded, this kit was plagued with some typical 80s MPC inaccuracies in that it suffered from generational, or perhaps genetic, drift. By ’87, it was full-on identity crisis. Like you, the details are very important to me. The wheels are what have me hung up on my current build of these. The body is obviously Shelby Z, the only version of the Daytona with the full-fledged aerodynamic cladding. T-tops were ‘totally awesome’ during that era, so the default sunroof is another anomaly. It’d be easy enough to modify the upper door frame and add a T-top if the kit was popped with a solid roof, but the sunroof takes converting it to the desirable T-top to another level of hassle. And, the wheels. My guess is MPC was using pre-production information from Chrysler/Dodge, and the Pacifica wheels must have been on the prototypes they were looking at. The real Shelby Z wheels were a carryover from the earlier sharper-edged Daytona C/S, and were far more common than the Pacifica wheels included in the kits. What’s worse, the Pacifica wheels were pretty much only used on that model of Daytona and maybe a Lebaron or two. Sourcing the correct Daytona C/S-style wheels has proven fruitless. Then there’s the engine, and you hit that nail on the head. By ’87, the Shelby Z was using the black Shelby valve cover, and there were multiple iterations of the 2.2 ‘small block’ turbo circulating throughout Chrysler’s offerings. All said, I might have talked myself into converting the Shelby Z to a Pacifica 🙂
I think the passion behind my interest in these Daytona kits came from the ’80s TV show, Hunter. Detective Sergeant Deedee McCall drove an ‘unmarked’ 84-85 Turbo Z in its iconic metallic crimson red over silver décor, and would occasionally throw the ‘excuse-me-light’ on the roof for a tail-drifting pursuit through the city. With the ’87 refresh, her new cruiser was a vivid bright red Shelby Z T-top, of course with the appropriate Shelby C/S wheels but uniquely painted gloss black with polished aluminum lip. About 20 years ago I built one to replicate the latter, but I was still building glue-bomb contraptions with smudged paint back then. At least the Pacifica wheels were easier to hide with a slathering of gloss black across their faces.
Regardless, you’ve done an amazing job and knowing these kits for the frustrations they represent, you’ve truly done it justice. And more kudos for the rare color combo! Well done!
Hello, and thanks for the comments!
It’s funny how the details, which almost nobody else will notice, are the things that drive you (and me) crazy, eh? It’s the same on almost every car kit, it seems. I’ve had to become very educated on 1964 Chevy C/K trucks to deal with the mish-mash that Revell gave us back in ’96. In some ways, it can kill the fun, but in others, it’s a fun game of “styrene CSI”.
I very much remember Hunter and of course Deedee and her car. It seems to have gotten a lot of air, was was the style back in the day too, if I recall correctly! Given the Pacifica wheels that are with the kit, I agree that doing one of her ’87 ride would be a great way to get a “do-over” on an old gluebomb, and to make them less stand-outish. As for me, I hit the point where I just used what they gave me. Eventually, the frustration would just be too much otherwise…
Thanks again for your detailed comments and your obvious love for these cars. I’m glad that there are other people out there obsessed with getting things right on these cars, and that can appreciate how difficult it can be!
Good luck with the next build, however you do it!
[…] was doing with engines by the 1980s. Those engines had textures and finely moulded details (see the Daytona as an example) that even Tamiya wasn’t able to capture in the 2.8L Cologne V6 that the XR4i comes […]