Heller 1/72 Bf-109G (OOB)

If it’s one thing I’m known for, it’s loving crappy kits. I’ve built my share, too: from various FROG kits (including the Ar-234 Blitz and He-219 Uhu) to the Revell Germany (nee Frog) Gannet to the Heller Lansen, I’ve seen a lot of bad kits. Thus, it can be assumed that I have both low standards and a high tolerance for pain.

I needed a Bf-109 for a Luft ’46 project. I knew the Academy kit was excellent, but I didn’t really feel all that good about butchering such a nice kit. I really wanted something that was a bit cheaper; something that no one would really miss if I cut it up. A Monogram 109 would have done just fine. Then, in Broughdale hobby shop here in London, Ontario, I found this little “gem”. I felt I had to share my first impression of this kit with you all. Just in case someone felt the need to order it, or buy its sister kit, a Tempest.

Don't let the okay box art fool you! The kit inside is a far less exciting and accurate. Opening the lid, I felt a kinship with the crew of the falling B-17 on the box top.

Don’t let the okay box art fool you! The kit inside is a far less exciting and accurate. Opening the lid, I felt a kinship with the crew of the falling B-17 on the box top.

My first thought was that for such a low price ($5.50) I really wouldn’t be getting much in the way of detail. I was both right and wrong. Taking the kit to the counter, I quipped with the cashier “This thing is going to be a piece of junk, isn’t it?” She responded that “Heller has improved recently, so it should be okay…” Right. My new battle cry is now: “They’ve improved!” Of course, I’m prone to sarcasm, so you can imagine just how ‘improved’ this model is.

This kit is, without a doubt, the biggest P.O.S. I have ever, EVER seen. It is equaled ONLY by the Monogram re-issue F-94, a mould from the 50’s, I believe. Heck, even the Seamaster was, in many ways, better than this thing!  When you consider that the 109 is from 1980 (allegedly), this model becomes unforgivable. I’m pretty darned certain that this is the ancient Airfix, given a new, albeit zombie-like lease on life in Heller packaging due to the somewhat incestuous relationship between these two makers. So, while it’s “from 1980”, it’s really not.

Upon opening the box I was treated to two unbagged sprues of green plastic in the vaguest shapes suggesting some kinship with Willi Messerchmitt’s famous fighter. That was about it, though. The casting on this kit is very rough, with large rivets festooning an outer skin replete with raised panel lines and considerable evidence of tired tooling. The interior consists of… a chair. No instrument panel, detail on the walls, control stick, nothing. Oh, there’s a lump that’s supposed to be a pilot. Poor chap must have been shot down and frozen to death on the Eastern Front; at least that’s how it looks.

There it is in all its "glory": the Heller 1/72 Bf-109G. that is exactly how it came; no bag, no nothing, just malformed pieces jammed into the box. That's quality sprue, right there, folks!

There it is in all its “glory”: the Heller 1/72 Bf-109G. that is exactly how it came; no bag, no nothing, just malformed pieces jammed into the box. That’s quality sprue, right there, folks!

The fit is God-awful. It is far worse that any of the Frogs I’ve built, and after the He-219, that’s saying something. The wings fit together well, but mating with the body is non-existent. The cockpit is nice, except it doesn’t have any kind of framing on it worth mentioning. Barely raised lines make it seem like there might have been an effort made, but not much of one.

Quite possibly the worst part, though, are the landing gear. The legs come moulded to the doors, and the sizing is a bit off. The tires themselves are a joke – I’ve seen pizza cutters with more footprint that these things! The propeller is not that bad, though, and the spinner is actually okay. The distinctive breech bulges of the G-model 109 are technically present, although they are terribly misformed and extend, like a horse collar, right across the nose!

The kits decals are very spartan, and include some iron crosses and kill markings for the tail. The strongest part of the kit is the weaponry. Because this kit isn’t badged as any particular model of 109, it comes with a lot of different weapons. It has a drop tank or a bomb for the centerline, as well as having two underwing cannon packs (eerily similar to the Starfix 109, actually…) and a pair of stovepipes! The aerial mortars are crude, and while they don’t hold up to the ones with the Revell Germany Me-262, they’re not bad. They include the right bracing and little mortar rounds for the fronts of them.

Unfortunately, there’s almost no way I can recommend this kit for anything other than kitbashing. It might be alright for a young modeller with very low expectations, but it’s a really disturbing piece of sprue for the rest of the world. Don’t say I didn’t warn you about this – build it at your own risk!


  1. Robert R Little · · Reply

    There’s a reason this kit isn’t that good; it isn’t Heller’s die at all. This is a re-boxed ancient Airfix kit. The original Heller Gustav was a much better kit than this.

    1. Yeah, I found that out afterwards. It looks a lot more like an Airfix than a Heller, and that would explain the mess in the box!

  2. David Garcia · · Reply

    I’m working the Heller 109G and the outline is very nice. I’m only adding a cockpit set and resin wheels to replace the buttons enclosed in the box.

    1. I was always a bit concerned about those cannon bulges; they seemed more like a horse collar than the proper shape. Still, it is nice in overall outline. Anyone who tackles that thing has my admiration!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: